Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests
currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang
the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite
and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us
catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests
working.
It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address
them later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527
llvm-svn: 355320
test/lang/cpp/class-template-parameter-pack/TestClassTemplateParameterPack.py
It fails on Mac OS; apparently a VarDecl 'void *&C' is implicitly
declared there, making the class template name C ambiguous.
llvm-svn: 354185
This patch properly extracts the full submodule path as well as its
search paths from DWARF import decls and passes it on to the
ClangModulesDeclVendor.
rdar://problem/47970144
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58090
llvm-svn: 353961
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch changes the behavior when printing C++ function references:
where we previously would get a <could not determine size>, there is
now a <no summary available>. It's not clear to me whether this is a
bug or an omission, but it's one step further than LLDB previously
got.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56798
llvm-svn: 351376
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of pr24764. The bug is not fixed (as in more of the tests that were marked this way are failing), but this set is passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349719
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of several different bugs. A couple of the bugs are now resolved as fixed since all the tests that were failing associated with the bug are now passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349711
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of pr21765. The bug is not fixed (as in more of the tests that were marked this way are failing), but this set is passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349668
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of pr24489. The bug is not fixed (as in more of the tests that were marked this way are failing), but this set is passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349665
These tests are now passing on linux, at least with top-of-tree clang,
clang-6 and gcc-7.3. It's possible it may still be failing with some
older compilers, but I don't have those around to test.
llvm-svn: 349478
Due to some libcxx changes to inlining, this now also crashes,
so it gets reported as "failure" by the bot. This commit doesn't
really change the status quo, just placates the bots.
llvm-svn: 345668
This applies the same workaround as r321271 to other tests. The root
problem is that lldb finds an internal symbol with the same name in the
debug info of system libraries, and then fails to disambiguate between
the two.
llvm-svn: 341235
Summary:
1) Several tests that are flakey on windows fail the run even if they are marked as expected to be flakey. This is because they fail frequently enough that even a retry won't help
2) Skip several tests on Windows that will occasionally hang rather than failing or exiting. This is causing the entire test suite to hang
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50198
llvm-svn: 338769
Summary:
The test suite has often unnecessary trailing whitespace, and sometimes
unnecessary trailing lines or a missing final new line. This patch just strips
trailing whitespace/lines and adds missing newlines at the end.
Subscribers: ki.stfu, JDevlieghere, christof, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49943
llvm-svn: 338171
Summary: It looks like the test file was copied from TestCPPStaticMethods.py because they have the same name. This means that the two tests will try to write to the same output files and will either overwrite each other's output or occasionally cause failures because they can't both access the same file.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49261
llvm-svn: 336960
Summary:
1) When ReadRegister is called with a null register into on Windows, rather than crashing due to an access violation, simply return false. Not all registers and properties will be read or calculated correctly, but that is consistent with other platforms that also return false in that case
2) Update a couple of tests to reference pr37995 as their reason for failure since it is much more accurate. Support for floating point registers doesn't exist on Windows at all, rather than having issues.
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48844
llvm-svn: 336147
libstdc++ will soon be dropped from the android NDK. This patch makes
sure we are prepared for that by using libc++ in tests by default (i.e.,
except for libstdc++ data formatter tests).
Only a couple of small tweaks were needed to make this work:
- Add the libc++ include paths to CXXFLAGS only. This was necessary to
make the tests compile with -fmodules. The modules tests have been
disabled, but this way, they will be ready for them if they are
enabled.
- in one test I had to add an explicit std::string copy to make sure the
copy constructor is there for the expression evaluator to find it.
llvm-svn: 335344
In a modules build, android is very picky about which symbols are
visible after including libc++ headers (e.g. <cstdio> defines only
std::printf and not ::printf).
This consolidates the tests where this was an issue to always include
the <c???> version of the headers and prefixes the symbols with std:: as
necessary.
Apart from that, there is no functional change in the tests.
llvm-svn: 335149
Apparently some compilers generate incomplete debug information which
caused the updated test to fail. Therefore I've extracted the new check
into a separate test case with the necessary decorators.
llvm-svn: 334456
Before Pavel's change in r334181, we were printing too many global
variables. This patch updates the test suite to ensure we don't regress
again in the future.
rdar://problem/29180927
llvm-svn: 334454
Summary: They all correspond to bugs that are already logged and I've added the appropriate (or most appropriate) bug numbers. This leaves only a handful of failing tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47892
llvm-svn: 334210
Summary:
... and fix one bug found this way. Currently, the test works not because
types are looked up correctly, but because by injecting local variables
we also materialize the types for Clang. If we disable the local variable
injection, then one check fails.
The reason of the failure is that FindTypes is run with max_matches==1
and this value is passed down to the symbol lookup functions. When the
search is performed only on the basename (like it's the case for an
entity defined in the root namespace), then the search will stop after
having found one match on the basename. But that match might be in a
namespace, we were really just looking up the basename in the accelerator
tables.
The solution is to not pass max_matches down, but to search without a
limit and let RemoveMismatchedTypes do its job afterwards. Note the
patch includes 2 hunks with the same change, but only the latter is
tested. I couldn't find a way to create a testcase for the other
branch of the if ('image lookup -t' allows me to get there, but it
only ever returns one type anyway).
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46548
llvm-svn: 331719
This patch fixes an issue where we weren't looking for exact matches in the expression parser and also fixed the type lookup logic in the Module.cpp. Tests added to make sure we don't regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46128
llvm-svn: 331227
The isOverload() method needs to account for situations where the two
methods being compared don't have the same number of arguments.
rdar://problem/39542960
llvm-svn: 330450
Summary:
We would fail to resolve (and thus display the value of) any
templated type which contained a template template argument even
though we don't really use template arguments.
This patch adds minimal support for template template arguments,
but I doubt we need any more than that.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44613
llvm-svn: 328984
- use more goodies from Makefile.rules to correctly build a 32-bit
binary.
- avoid hardcoding typeof(nil) in the test.
This should partially fix the linux bot. There is still one assertion
failure remaining, which I'll have to investigate separately, as I am
not experiencing it locally.
llvm-svn: 328083
New tests should run the make syntax voodoo $@ and $<
instead of hardcoding the names. We should also document
how to write one, it's on my list.
llvm-svn: 328062
Instead of applying the sledgehammer of refusing to insert any
C++ symbol in the ASTContext, try to validate the decl if what
we have is an operator. There was other code in lldb which was
responsible for this, just not really exposed (or used) in this
codepath. Also, add a better/more comprehensive test.
<rdar://problem/35645893>
llvm-svn: 328025
Summary:
When in a gmodules-like debugging scenario, you can have a parent decl context
that gets imported from an external AST. When this happens, we must be careful
to complete this type before adding children to it, otherwise it sometimes
results in a crash.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43592
llvm-svn: 327750
gcc will say that the type of "this" is "T * const", clang "T *".
Compare the unqualified type names to erase the difference between the
two, as the constness is not a part of this test.
FWIW, I think that the gcc behavior makes more sense here.
llvm-svn: 326449
There's a bug in FindTypes, it ignores the exact flag if you pass a name that doesn't begin with
:: and pass eTypeClassAny for the type.
In this case we always know that the name we get from the vtable name is absolute so we can
work around the bug by prepending the "::". This doesn't fix the FindTypes bug.
<rdar://problem/38010986>
llvm-svn: 326412
Further investigation required; tests will be enabled on the buildbot
worker soon. Marking failing tests for now in order to start with a
green buildbot while investigation takes place.
This is a recommit of r326134, with the required import added.
llvm.org/pr36527
llvm-svn: 326166
Further investigation required; tests will be enabled on the buildbot
worker soon. Marking failing tests for now in order to start with a
green buildbot while investigation takes place.
llvm.org/pr36527
llvm-svn: 326134
Summary:
Update makefiles to specify -fPIC in Makefile.rules and only throw -fPIC when building a shared library. This change is necessary to allow building the lldb tests on Windows where -fPIC is not a valid option.
Update a few places to Python 3.x syntax
Reviewers: zturner, lldb-commits
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: stella.stamenova, labath, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42994
llvm-svn: 324671
This patch is the result of a discussion on lldb-dev, see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013111.html for
background.
For each test (should be eventually: each test configuration) a
separate build directory is created and we execute
make VPATH=$srcdir/path/to/test -C $builddir/path/to/test -f $srcdir/path/to/test/Makefile -I $srcdir/path/to/test
In order to make this work all LLDB tests need to be updated to find
the executable in the test build directory, since CWD still points at
the test's source directory, which is a requirement for unittest2.
Although we have done extensive testing, I'm expecting that this first
attempt will break a few bots. Please DO NOT HESITATE TO REVERT this
patch in order to get the bots green again. We will likely have to
iterate on this some more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281
llvm-svn: 323803
TestLibcxxListLoop - fails because the evil "define private public"
trick does not work with gmodules. The purpose of the test is not to
test debug info parsing so I just mark it as no_debug_info_testcase.
In the long term it may be interesting to write a mock std::list which
will allow us to test bad inputs to data formatters more easily.
TestGModules - seems to be a genuine bug. Filed pr36107 and xfailed.
llvm-svn: 323520
This test stresses expression evaluation support for template functions.
Currently the support is rudimentary, and running this test causes assertion
failures in clang. This test cannot be XFAIL'ed because the test harness
treats assertion failures as unexpected events. For now, the test must be
skipped.
llvm-svn: 322340
This fixes a bug in -gmodules DWARF handling when debugging without a .dSYM bundle
that was particularly noticable when debugging LLVM itself.
Debugging without clang modules and DWO handling should be unaffected by this patch.
<rdar://problem/32436209>
llvm-svn: 321802
Two tests were failing because the debugger was picking up multiply
defined internal symbols from the system libraries. This is a bug, as
there should be no ambiguity because the tests are defining variables
with should shadow these symbols, but lldb is not smart enough to figure
that out.
I work around the issue by renaming the variables in these tests, and in
exchange I create a self-contained test which reproduces the issue
without depending on the system libraries.
This increases the predictability of our test suite.
llvm-svn: 321271
I tested on x86-64 and Jason on embedded architectures.
This cleans up another couple of reported unexpected successes.
<rdar://problem/28623427>
llvm-svn: 320452
Summary:
This flag is on by default for darwin and freebsd, but off for linux.
Without it, clang will sometimes not emit debug info for types like
std::string. Whether it does this, and which tests will fail because of
that depends on the linux distro and c++ library version.
A bunch of tests were already setting these flags manually, but here
instead I take a whole sale approach and enable this flag for all tests.
Any test which does not want to have this flag (right now we have one
such test) can turn it off explicitly via
CFLAGS_EXTRAS+=$(LIMIT_DEBUG_INFO_FLAGS)
This fixes a bunch of data formatter tests on red-hat.
Reviewers: davide, jankratochvil
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, krytarowski, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40717
llvm-svn: 319653
The Linux xfail decorator was removed in r272326 with the claim that the
test "runs reliably on the linux x86 buildbot." It also runs reliably on
FreeBSD for me.
llvm.org/pr25925
llvm-svn: 310644
This reapplies https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740 with a tweak to find
the section by name rather than type. Section types don't distinguish
between regular sections and their DWO counterparts.
llvm-svn: 308905
The DWO handling code can get confused by clang modules which also use
skeleton CUs to point to the object file with the full debug
info. This patch detects whether an object is a "real" DWO or a clang
module and prevents LLDB from interpreting clang modules as DWO. This
fixes the regression in TestWithModuleDebugging.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=33875
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740
llvm-svn: 308850
This works on SVN but is a bit fragile on the Swift branch.
I'm adding the test to both, so we have this path covered.
<rdar://problem/32372372>
llvm-svn: 304314
Templates can end in parameter packs, like this
template <class T...> struct MyStruct
{ /*...*/ };
LLDB does not currently support these parameter packs;
it does not emit them into the template argument list
at all. This causes problems when you specialize, e.g.:
template <> struct MyStruct<int>
{ /*...*/ };
template <> struct MyStruct<int, int> : MyStruct<int>
{ /*...*/ };
LLDB generates two template specializations, each with
no template arguments, and then when they are imported
by the ASTImporter into a parser's AST context we get a
single specialization that inherits from itself,
causing Clang's record layout mechanism to smash its
stack.
This patch fixes the problem for classes and adds
tests. The tests for functions fail because Clang's
ASTImporter can't import them at the moment, so I've
xfailed that test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33025
llvm-svn: 302833
Many times a user wants to access a type when there's a variable of
the same name, or a variable when there's a type of the same name.
Depending on the precise context, currently the expression parser
can fail to resolve one or the other.
This is because ClangExpressionDeclMap has logic to limit the
amount of information it searches, and that logic sometimes cuts
down the search prematurely. This patch removes some of those early
exits.
In that sense, this patch trades performance (early exit is faster)
for correctness.
I've also included two new test cases showing examples of this
behavior – as well as modifying an existing test case that gets it
wrong.
llvm-svn: 301273
The test fails because an older clang did not emit the required debug
info (I am not sure when this got added, but clang-3.7 certainly did not
work yet). The actual platform has nothing to do with this.
llvm-svn: 300834
Fails with all versions of arm/aarch64 gcc available on ubuntu 16.04/14.04.
Passes with Linaro GCC version >= 4.8 but fails with >= 5.0. But There are other regressions when we use Linaro GCC.
llvm-svn: 286574
The debug info emitted by clang for static variables improved by
rL286302 and it exposed an incorrect test expactation because now LLDB
able to displays more data 9thanks to better debug info) then before.
llvm-svn: 286360
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Clang on ARM64 was making the three Function methods with identical bodies have
one implementation that was shared. That threw off the count of breakpoints, since
we don't count as separate locations three functions with the same address.
I also cleaned up the test case while I was at it.
<rdar://problem/27001915>
llvm-svn: 279800
Summary:
referencing a user-defined operator new was triggering an assert in clang because we were
registering the function name as string "operator new", instead of using the special operator
enum, which clang has for this purpose. Method operators already had code to handle this, and now
I extend this to cover free standing operator functions as well. Test included.
Reviewers: spyffe
Subscribers: sivachandra, paulherman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17856
llvm-svn: 278670
It's always hard to remember when to include this file, and
when you do include it it's hard to remember what preprocessor
check it needs to be behind, and then you further have to remember
whether it's windows.h or win32.h which you need to include.
This patch changes the name to PosixApi.h, which is more appropriately
named, and makes it independent of any preprocessor setting.
There's still the issue of people not knowing when to include this,
because there's not a well-defined set of things it exposes other
than "whatever is missing on Windows", but at least this should
make it less painful to fix when problems arise.
This patch depends on LLVM revision r278170.
llvm-svn: 278177
Summary:
One of the tests there does not work with gcc, so I'm spinning that off into a separate test, so
that we can XFAIL it with more granularity.
I am also renaming the test to reflect the fact that it no longer tests only integer arguments.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21923
llvm-svn: 274505
We were checking for integer types only before this. So I added the ability for CompilerType objects to check for integer and enum types.
Then I searched for places that were using the CompilerType::IsIntegerType(...) function. Many of these places also wanted to be checking for enumeration types as well, so I have fixed those places. These are in the ABI plug-ins where we are figuring out which arguments would go in where in regisers/stack when making a function call, or determining where the return value would live. The real fix for this is to use clang to compiler a CGFunctionInfo and then modify the code to be able to take the IR and a calling convention and have the backend answer the questions correctly for us so we don't need to create a really bad copy of the ABI in each plug-in, but that is beyond the scope of this bug fix.
Also added a test case to ensure this doesn't regress in the future.
llvm-svn: 273750
Prior to this we would display the typename for "TestObj<-1>" as "TestObj<4294967295>" when we showed the type. Expression parsing could also fail because we would fail to find the mangled name when evaluating expressions.
The issue was we were losing the signed'ness of the template integer parameter in DWARFASTParserClang.cpp.
<rdar://problem/25577041>
llvm-svn: 272434
