This reverts commit r326261 as it introduces inconsistencies in the
handling of load addresses for ObjectFileELF -- some parts of the class
use physical addresses, and some use virtual. This has manifested itself
as us not being able to set the load address of the vdso "module" on
android.
llvm-svn: 326367
Summary:
When writing an object file over gdb-remote, use the vFlashErase, vFlashWrite, and vFlashDone commands if the write address is in a flash memory region. A bare metal target may have this kind of setup.
- Update ObjectFileELF to set load addresses using physical addresses. A typical case may be a data section with a physical address in ROM and a virtual address in RAM, which should be loaded to the ROM address.
- Add support for querying the target's qXfer:memory-map, which contains information about flash memory regions, leveraging MemoryRegionInfo data structures with minor modifications
- Update ProcessGDBRemote to use vFlash commands in DoWriteMemory when the target address is in a flash region
Original discussion at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013093.html
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: arichardson, emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145
Patch by Owen Shaw <llvm@owenpshaw.net>
llvm-svn: 326261
Summary:
This adds a SBDebugger::GetBuildConfiguration static function, which
returns a SBStructuredData describing the the build parameters of
liblldb. Right now, it just contains one entry: whether we were built
with XML support.
I use the new functionality to skip a test which requires XML support,
but concievably the new function could be useful to other liblldb
clients as well (making sure the library supports the feature they are
about to use).
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43333
llvm-svn: 325504
These were missed in the great refactor because they were added
concurrently with it. Since we started running tests in a more parallel
fashion they started to be flaky. This should fix it.
Now that we are no longer polluting the source tree, I also delete the
bit of custom cleanup code specific to these tests.
llvm-svn: 325495
This test uses XML packets, but libxml is an optional dependency of
lldb, and this test fails if it is not present.
I'm leaving this enabled on mac, as thats the only platform that's
likely to have libxml always available, but ideally we should have a way
to skip this based on build configuration. I'll see if I can whip
something like that up soon, but for the time being, this unblocks the
buildbots.
llvm-svn: 324870
arch incompat with spec in file so it's rejected and the test fails.
will look into this later, will be a test case issue not a test issue;
test case may only be valid when lldb is built for/running on an x86_64
system.
llvm-svn: 324795
Summary:
The test was trying to reproduce a bug in handling of two concurrent
events, which was impossible to do reliably in a black-box style test.
In practice, this meant the test was only ever failing on remote
targets, as these were slow enough to trigger this.
Fortunately, we now have the ability to mock the server side of the
connection, which means we can simulate the failure deterministically,
so I rewrite the test to use the new gdb-client framework.
I've needed to add a couple of new packets to the mock server to be able
to do this. Instead of trying to guess how a "typical" gdb-client test
will want to handle this, I throw an exception in the implementation to
force the user to override them (the packets are only sent if the test
explicitly performs some action which will trigger them, so a basic test
which e.g. does not need the "continue" functionality will not need to
implement them).
Reviewers: owenpshaw
Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42959
llvm-svn: 324590
The mock server was sending acks back in response to spurious acks from
the client, but the client was not prepared to handle these. Most of the
time this would work because the only time the client was sending
unsolicited acks is after the initial connection, and there reply-ack
would get ignored in the "flush all packets from the server" loop which
came after the ack. However, this loop had only a 10ms delay, and
sometimes this was not enough to catch the reply (which meant the
connection got out of sync, and test failed).
Since this behavior not consistent with how lldb-server handles this
situation (it just ignores the ack), I fix the mock server to do the
same.
llvm-svn: 323953
Summary:
Adds new utilities that make it easier to write test cases for lldb acting as a client over a gdb-remote connection.
- A GDBRemoteTestBase class that starts a mock GDB server and provides an easy way to check client packets
- A MockGDBServer that, via MockGDBServerResponder, can be made to issue server responses that test client behavior.
- Utility functions for handling common data encoding/decoding
- Utility functions for creating dummy targets from YAML files
----
Split from the review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145, which was a new feature that necessitated the new testing capabilities.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath
Subscribers: hintonda, davide, jingham, krytarowski, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42195
Patch by Owen Shaw <llvm@owenpshaw.net>
llvm-svn: 323636
