Summary:
Instead of each test case knowing its depth relative to the test root,
we can just have dotest add the folder containing Makefile.rules to the
include path.
This was motivated by r370616, though I have been wanting to do this
ever since we moved to building tests out-of-tree.
The only manually modified files in this patch are lldbinline.py and
plugins/builder_base.py. The rest of the patch has been produced by this
shell command:
find . \( -name Makefile -o -name '*.mk' \) -exec sed --in-place -e '/LEVEL *:\?=/d' -e '1,2{/^$/d}' -e 's,\$(LEVEL)/,,' {} +
Reviewers: teemperor, aprantl, espindola, jfb
Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, christof, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67083
llvm-svn: 370845
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of several different bugs. A couple of the bugs are now resolved as fixed since all the tests that were failing associated with the bug are now passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349713
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
this is a resubmission of r280476. The problem with the original commit was that it was printing
out all numbers as signed, which was wrong for unsigned numbers with the MSB set. Fix that and
add a unit test covering that case.
llvm-svn: 280480
This reverts commit r280476 as it breaks several tests on i386. I was fixing an 32-bit
breakage, and I did not run the 32-bit test suite before submitting, oops.
llvm-svn: 280478
Summary:
It seems the original intention of the function was printing signed values in decimal format, and
unsigned values in hex (without the leading "0x"). However, signed and unsigned long were
exchanged, which lead to amusing test failures in TestMemoryFind.py.
Instead of just switching the two, I think we should just print everything in decimal here, as
the current behaviour is very confusing (especially when one does not request printing of types).
Nothing seems to depend on this behaviour except and we already have a way for the user to
request the format he wants when printing values for most commands (which presumably does not go
through this function).
I also add a unit tests for the function in question.
Reviewers: clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24126
llvm-svn: 280476
the test fails for a very prosaic reason: `(const char *)0x1000` returns "4096" on x86_64 and
"1000" (without the "0x") on i386. I haven't tried other 32-bit arches, but I am guessing the
behaviour is the same. XFAIL until someone can get a chance to look at this.
llvm-svn: 280344